| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
1
   |
Posted - 2017.06.09 23:43:14 -
[1] - Quote
Heavy Fighters (Long Range Attack): 30% reduction to Basic Attack damage. - really? Are you out of your mind? Just canceled the subscription on my all accounts. Have fun CCP |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
3
|
Posted - 2017.06.10 08:06:03 -
[2] - Quote
One more thing. Currently when ratting in carreir/super you have to pay much attention not to miss the cycle or decycle figters to avoid incoming dps. It's engaging its demanding but it's fun especially after latest rocky haven changes. Now you wanna increase by 15% NPC shooting rate and nerf the fighters dps. Let me remind you that the set od heavy fighters costs around 450 mil. While nerfing dps clearing the wave will take more time and a simple mistake will make them to volley out the fighters. Comparing this situation with afk VNI ratters when you can make same sites not even payin attenation to the monitor is insane.
Why don't you fix first main known problem - fighters stop moving after NPC dies - i know you're aware of that problem but you haven't provided any solution so far |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 10:02:50 -
[3] - Quote
BAHKO21pyc wrote:Dear CCP, i want to express gratitude for this changes! All last changes were boosting cap/supercap ratting segment. You have forgotten abou porr solo/small scale pvp players long time ago. We can't ge figth without cap blob in grid at all. All small scale pvp is dying, and its pissing us off. And all that pain and suffering of carebears is the most amazing thing that you did in these latter days. I'll be very grateful to you if you do more nerf for caps/supers (especially in damage aplication against subcaps). There is can't be balance with that overboosted cap fleet. Caps must fight with other caps.
Situation form about a month ago - 20 t3 cruisers fleet with 5 - 6 scimis on one side against 10 carriers and 2 supers. Capital fleet couldn't break a single scimi. And CCP talking about rebalancing.....yeah. Nerfing carriers and super is the most ******** CCP decision since i started to play EVE |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 10:42:10 -
[4] - Quote
Mama Ja wrote:Analius Glover wrote:BAHKO21pyc wrote:Dear CCP, i want to express gratitude for this changes! All last changes were boosting cap/supercap ratting segment. You have forgotten abou porr solo/small scale pvp players long time ago. We can't ge figth without cap blob in grid at all. All small scale pvp is dying, and its pissing us off. And all that pain and suffering of carebears is the most amazing thing that you did in these latter days. I'll be very grateful to you if you do more nerf for caps/supers (especially in damage aplication against subcaps). There is can't be balance with that overboosted cap fleet. Caps must fight with other caps. Situation form about a month ago - 20 t3 cruisers fleet with 5 - 6 scimis on one side against 10 carriers and 2 supers. Capital fleet couldn't break a single scimi. And CCP talking about rebalancing.....yeah. Nerfing carriers and supers is the most ******** CCP decision since i started to play EVE you just noobs,who cant use webs.so cry more about nerfs...
good point - considering that the light fighters with mwd can go 12km /s and still have same apllication as they go 2km /s the speed diffrence of webbed target should be irrelevant |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 09:14:40 -
[5] - Quote
Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote:To be fair, the last couple days have been the weekend so CCP employees haven't necessarily been around to keep track of what's going on. That is kind of the downside of announcing a change on Friday when it needs to be set in stone on Monday though...
Funny because according to CCP FoxFour " we don't like to do deployments on Fridays" |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 16:03:23 -
[6] - Quote
Sam Khanid wrote:Linus is the biggest troll on this forum, I'd almost swear she's logging in alts to like her posts x2 everytime she does it - her prose reaks of vanity, and her logic is about as hollow as it gets. Nerfing fighters by 20% damage is a **** move, there are hundreds of posts from others in this threadchain echoing those thoughts, but CCP doesn't care and all our words are worth less than nothing to them. If you hate the changes, unsub for a month or two and hit them in the wallet--nothing else matters.
That's why he was kicked from BB. Just ignore that crying girl |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
5
|
Posted - 2017.06.13 08:31:56 -
[7] - Quote
I'm still not satisfied with this changes because it has nothing to do with rebalancing but rather penalyzing. The best solution that was mentioned before would be introducing fatigue like timer/counter which will reduce bounty for hardcore grinders and still will let casual players earn their money and have fun. It could looks like that:
Daily:
<10 sites - 100% bounty
>10 sites <20 - 80% bounty
>20 sites - 60% bounty
.....
etc.
This will let you keep your beloved afk VNIs in good shape as well as smarbombing machariels and reduce carrier/super ISK faucet while maintaining their PvP abilities. Claiming that they are overpowerd is ridiculous so please stop.
This is short term solution tho. We expect adding new types anomalies dedicated for cerriers/supers |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
7
|
Posted - 2017.06.13 11:57:56 -
[8] - Quote
Mary Timeshift Jane wrote:Analius Glover wrote:which will reduce bounty for hardcore grinders and still will let casual players earn their money and have fun. Good job. Catering to the weak by intentionally crippling the strong. No surprise there, only brainfreezed human can have mentality so sickening and of anti progression. Have yourself locked in an institute for mentally degenerated. Please, favor to humanity.
Do you have problems with reading or just mentally disabled? I am strongly aginst that changes especially reducing the carrier dps. CCP did it anyway so i think it would better solution then nerfing fighters. But still disappointing and unfair. There shoud be no restrictions in that matter. |
Analius Glover
The Fatal Visionaries
Honorable Third Party
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.16 09:31:25 -
[9] - Quote
Just for you know CCP - further nerfing cariers and supers and making them less effective on anomalies will make people to drop them as a source of income. Ths will remove a content for smalgangs and hotdroppers because very little amount of people risks such expensive ships for PvP. So if you wanna make a change make a new anomalies which still will make players to undock their shiny ships otherwise the lack of content cancer will continue spreading across New Eden. Same with the rorqs - you made a good decision bringing them to the ore sites but now you doing all to make them replaced by multiboxing mining barges and exhumers. Stop penalizing normal players and support afk multiboxers |
| |
|